Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World : Jack Weatherford :Look Inside. Mar 22, ISBN The Mongol army led by Genghis Khan subjugated more lands and people in twenty-five years than the Romans did in four hundred. In nearly every country the Mongols conquered, they brought an unprecedented rise in cultural communication, expanded trade, and a blossoming of civilization. Vastly more progressive than his European or Asian counterparts, Genghis Khan abolished torture, granted universal religious freedom, and smashed feudal systems of aristocratic privilege.
Genghis Khan and the Making of The Modern World - Joe Bradford #InsideMyLIbrary Book Review
Book review: “Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World” by Jack Weatherford
Let me tell you from the very outset, Genghis Khan was not a Muslim who perpetrated various acts of violence against the people of India. Furthermore, he even failed to mount a conquest on India as he found the weather to be too hot. He was brutal, effective, open-minded and a dynamic leader. From inner steppes of Mongolia, a man from a small and insignificant hunting tribe would one day trounce the Germans, the Jurched dynasty of China, lay waste to the kingdom of sultan of Khwarizm through fiendish military techniques, superior technology and collective intelligence, defeating armies many times larger than his own. More than anything else, Mongols burst the bubble of European society. After reading this book, one can only glean the narrow-mindedness, self-centeredness and utter ignorance of a monolithic, Christian society — namely Europe, and how miniscule its impact was on the rest of the world in the earlier th century. Yet retrospectively, once they had ruled the very many, colonies around the world in the later-half of the millennium — they tarnished and ridiculed the advents of progress in Asia that acted as a precursor to their own industrial revolution.
See a Problem?
It is a narrative of the rise and influence of Genghis Khan and his successors, and their influence on European civilization. Weatherford provides a different slant on Genghis Khan than has been typical in most Western accounts, attributing positive cultural effects to his rule. In the last section, he reviews the historiography of Genghis Khan in the West and argues that the leader's early portrayal in writings as an "excellent, noble king" changed to that of a brutal pagan during the Age of Enlightenment. In Paul Ratchnevsky wrote about the Khan's knack for forging alliances, his fairness in dividing the spoils, and his patronage of the sciences. Howorth have argued that the Mongol empire contributed to opening up intellectual interactions between China, the Middle East, and Europe. The book suggests that the western depiction of the Mongols as savages who destroyed civilization was due to the Mongols' approach to dealing with the competing leadership classes.
pdf free download